High Court: Right to Rent does breach human rights
The Right to Rent Scheme: An Introduction
The Right to Rent scheme, introduced by Theresa May when she was Home Secretary, aimed to address the growing concerns around illegal immigration. However, it has sparked controversy and criticism over its implementation and impact on landlords.
Who is Responsible for Checking Tenants' Immigration Status?
Landlords were made responsible for checking the immigration status of tenants under the Right to Rent scheme. This responsibility has led to significant concerns, especially among landlord organizations, who argue that it unfairly places them in a position where they could face prosecution if they fail to verify status correctly.
The Legal Challenge Against Right to Rent
The Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI), with backing from organizations like the Residential Landlords Association (RLA) and Liberty, challenged the Right to Rent policy in court. They argued that it led to discrimination and violated human rights, particularly against non-UK nationals and British ethnic minorities.
High Court’s Ruling on Human Rights Violations
In a pivotal decision, the High Court ruled that the Right to Rent scheme breaches the European Convention on Human Rights. The ruling highlights how the scheme fosters discrimination by landlords against non-UK nationals, and it also emphasizes the inadequacy of the government's safeguards to prevent such discrimination.
The Government's Safeguards: Ineffective or Insufficient?
Despite the government's efforts to provide safeguards such as online guidance and telephone advice, the High Court found these measures ineffective in preventing discrimination. The evaluation of the scheme was also criticized for failing to consider discrimination based on nationality, focusing only on ethnicity.
Calls for the Scrapping of Right to Rent
Following the court ruling, the Residential Landlords Association (RLA) has called on the government to accept the decision and abandon the Right to Rent scheme. They advocate for a more sensible approach to managing immigration, one that does not burden untrained landlords with the responsibilities of the Home Office.
Planetrent Properties
Under Offer: This term applies to a property where the landlord is considering an offer but remains on the market. It implies that further offers may still be considered until the landlord formally accepts or declines the current offer.
Let Agreed: This term indicates that a landlord has provisionally agreed to enter into a rental agreement with a prospective tenant, pending additional checks and referencing. It doesn't require the prospective tenant to have paid a holding deposit.
Let: This term signifies an established binding rental agreement between the landlord and tenant.
For both lettings and sales, the guidance addresses additional terms:
New On The Market: This term is used for a property not advertised since its last sale or rental. It should only be used for a brief period.
New Instruction: It applies to a property assigned to an agent for marketing recently, even if it was previously listed with another agent without being sold or rented.
New and Exclusive: This term refers to a property that is either new on the market or a new instruction, exclusively available through a specific agent or portal.
New Method of Sale/Let: This term is used when a property is being marketed for sale or rent using an alternative approach to the original advertisement, such as transitioning to an auction or sealed bid.
Reduced: This term indicates that a property's price has recently been reduced. The reduction should be genuine and comply with the Chartered Trading Standards Institute's guidelines on pricing practices.